Orthopedic Trends Survey (Hospital Purchasers)
March 2010
A survey of 50 Hospital Purchasers
Price: $2500
Deliverables: Survey Data Only
Please contact Howard.Brick@panelintelligence.com to purchase.
S1. Please select the title which most closely mirrors your role.
- Finance
- Materials Management
- OR Director
- Operations
- Other (terminate)
S2. For how many surgical sites (hospitals, ASCs, etc) can you quantify orthopedic implant use?
- _____ ASCs (outside of hospital walls, regardless of ownership)
- ______ Hospital-based surgical sites (inside of hospital walls)
- None (exclusive, terminate)
<Page Break>
S3. How many knee cases (using surgical implants) did your institution (all sites combined) perform in 2009?
_____________
S4. How many hip cases (using surgical implants) did your institution (all sites combined) perform in 2009?
____________
(Terminate <250 combined S3 and S4)
<Page Break>
S5. How familiar are you with orthopedic implant use and pricing?
Very familiar
Somewhat familiar (Terminate)
Not at all familiar (Terminate)
Insert Qualify Text
QUOTA: 50
<Page Break>
1. Which vendors implants have your institution used between 2009 and predicted out to the end of 2011 for knee and hip implant cases? Please select all that apply.
Knee:
- Zimmer
- J+J/ DePuy
- Stryker
- Smith and Nephew
- Biomet
- Other, please specify _______
- I do not perform knee cases [Exclusive choice]
Hip:
- Zimmer
- J+J/ DePuy
- Stryker
- Smith and Nephew
- Biomet
- Other, please specify _________
- I do not perform hip cases [Exclusive choice]
<Page Break>
2. Has your institution made a major switch regarding implant vendors in the past year, or do you expect a switch in the coming 12 months?
- Major switch in past 12 months
- Major switch coming in the next 12 months
- No major switch
Skip to Q4 if No major switch in Q2 and if knees>0 in Q1, or ELSE skip to Q5
<Page Break>
3. Please describe the details of the product switch:
Previous vendor (Switching FROM):
- Zimmer
- J+J/ DePuy
- Stryker
- Smith and Nephew
- Biomet
- Other, please specify _________
Replacement vendor (Switching TO):
- Zimmer
- J+J/ DePuy
- Stryker
- Smith and Nephew
- Biomet
- Other, please specify _________
Please describe in detail the reasoning and details of the switch:
[LARGE TEXT BOX]
Skip to Q5 if no knees from Q1
<Page Break>
4. Please estimate/predict the number of knee cases your institution performed or plans on performing in each of the following 3-month time periods: last year, this year, and next year:
[highlight the three different years by column shading or extra bold lines] [Note: updated dates]
|
|
Last Year |
This Year |
Next Year | |||||||||
|
|
July Sept 2008 |
Oct Dec 2008 |
Jan Mar 2009 |
Apr Jun 2009 |
July Sept 2009 |
Oct Dec 2009 |
Jan Mar 2010 |
Apr Jun 2010 |
July Sept 2010 |
Oct Dec 2010 |
Jan Mar 2011 |
Apr Jun 2011 |
|
Number of Knee Cases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skip to Q6 if no hips from Q1
<Page Break>
5. Please estimate/predict the number of hip cases your institution performed or plans on performing in each of the following 3-month time periods: last year, this year, and next year:
[highlight the three different years by column shading or extra bold lines] [Note: updated dates]
|
|
Last Year |
This Year |
Next Year | |||||||||
|
|
July Sept 2008 |
Oct Dec 2008 |
Jan Mar 2009 |
Apr Jun 2009 |
July Sept 2009 |
Oct Dec 2009 |
Jan Mar 2010 |
Apr Jun 2010 |
July Sept 2010 |
Oct Dec 2010 |
Jan Mar 2011 |
Apr Jun 2011 |
|
Number of Hip Cases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skip to Q7 if no knees from Q1
<Page Break>
6. Please estimate/predict the percentage of cases in which your institution used or plans on using various surgical implants in knee cases across the following 3-month time periods: last year, this year, and next year:
[RANDOMIZE ROWS, BUT ANCHOR OTHER, highlight the three different years by column shading or extra bold lines, Hide rows based on Q1_Knees]
[Note: updated dates]
|
|
Last Year |
This Year |
Next Year | |||||||||
|
Percentage of All Knee Cases |
July Sept 2008 |
Oct Dec 2008 |
Jan Mar 2009 |
Apr Jun 2009 |
July Sept 2009 |
Oct Dec 2009 |
Jan Mar 2010 |
Apr Jun 2010 |
July Sept 2010 |
Oct Dec 2010 |
Jan Mar 2011 |
Apr Jun 2011 |
|
Zimmer |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
J+J/ DePuy |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Stryker |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Smith and Nephew |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Biomet |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Other |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
TOTAL |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Skip to Q8 if no hips from Q1
<Page Break>
7. Please estimate/predict the percentage of cases in which your institution used or plans on using various surgical implants in hip cases across the following 3-month time periods: last year, this year, and next year:
[RANDOMIZE ROWS, BUT ANCHOR OTHER, highlight the three different years by column shading or extra bold lines, Hide rows based on Q1_hips]
[Note: updated dates]
|
|
Last Year |
This Year |
Next Year | |||||||||
|
Percentage of All Hip Cases |
July Sept 2008 |
Oct Dec 2008 |
Jan Mar 2009 |
Apr Jun 2009 |
July Sept 2009 |
Oct Dec 2009 |
Jan Mar 2010 |
Apr Jun 2010 |
July Sept 2010 |
Oct Dec 2010 |
Jan Mar 2011 |
Apr Jun 2011 |
|
Zimmer |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
J+J/ DePuy |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Stryker |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Smith and Nephew |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Biomet |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
Other |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
TOTAL |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Sum to 100% |
Skip to Q9 if no knees from Q1
<Page Break>
8. Please estimate the price point for each vendors knee implants to your institution in these three time frames. If you are not aware of the price point, please leave blank.
Note: Premium products include such products as gender-specific models, mobile-bearing products, or metal-on-metal units
[RANDOMIZE ROWS, BUT ANCHOR OTHER, highlight the three different years by column shading or extra bold lines. Hide rows based on Q1_knees]
|
Knee: Vendor |
Product Level |
2009 |
2010 (Estimated) |
2011 (Estimated) |
|
Zimmer |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
J+J/ DePuy |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Stryker |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Smith and Nephew |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Biomet |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Other |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
Skip to Q10 if no hips from Q1
<Page Break>
9. Please estimate the price point for each vendors hip implants to your institution in these three time frames. If you are not aware of the price point, please leave blank.
Note: Premium products include such products as gender-specific models, mobile-bearing products, or metal-on-metal units
[RANDOMIZE ROWS, BUT ANCHOR OTHER, highlight the three different years by column shading or extra bold lines. Hide rows based on Q1_hips]
|
Hip: Vendor |
Product Level |
2009 |
2010 (Estimated) |
2011 (Estimated) |
|
Zimmer |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
J+J/ DePuy |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Stryker |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Smith and Nephew |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Biomet |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
Other |
Standard |
$ |
$ |
$ |
|
|
Premium |
$ |
$ |
$ |
Skip to Q11 if no knees from Q1
<Page Break>
10. Please estimate what percentage of implants used in knee cases was premium level (as opposed to standard level) in each of these three time frames.
Note: Premium products include such products as gender-specific models, mobile-bearing products, or metal-on-metal units
[Hide rows based on Q1_knees]
|
Knee: Vendor |
Product Level |
2009 |
2010 (Estimated) |
2011 (Estimated) |
|
Zimmer |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
|
J+J/ DePuy |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
|
Stryker |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
|
Smith and Nephew |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
|
Biomet |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
|
Other |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
Skip to END SURVEY if no hips from Q1
<Page Break>
11. Please estimate what percentage of implants used in hip cases was premium level (as opposed to standard level) in each of these three time frames.
Note: Premium products include such products as gender-specific models, mobile-bearing products, or metal-on-metal units
[Hide rows based on Q1_hip]
|
Hip: Vendor |
Product Level |
2009 |
2010 (Estimated) |
2011 (Estimated) |
|
Zimmer |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
|
J+J/ DePuy |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
|
Stryker |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
|
Smith and Nephew |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
|
Biomet |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
|
Other |
Premium |
% |
% |
% |
END SURVEY
Print Abstract
For additional information on this study or to purchase, please call:
|
Survey
Orthopedic Surgery |